Key tensions and trade-offs
As society becomes more dependent on algorithmic decision-making, the Algorithmic Sabotage Research Group (ASRG) continues to pioneer the tools required for digital autonomy, ensuring that the "labour of subversion" remains a viable response to technological authoritarianism.
Algorithmic Sabotage Research Group - Our Collaborative Tools
: The group advocates for community solidarity that actively bypasses legal, social, or machine-implemented categorization schemes. Tactical Methodologies: Sabot in the Age of AI
The ASRG documents and synthesizes an array of strategically offensive methodologies. These tactics target the core vulnerabilities of automated scraping mechanisms, which rely on the unconsenting harvest of web data. Data Poisoning and Scrambling
Turning theoretical critique into active resistance (praxis) against "necropolitical" technologies—those that manage or devalue life.
According to the group’s foundational literature, including their widely distributed , the concept is not defined as an atavistic or blind aversion to machines. Instead, it is framed as an intentional figure of techno-disobedience .
Using artistic-activist methods to expose "fascist techno-solutionism" and build communal alternatives based on mutual aid and care.
: ASRG seeks to replace passive academic critique with practical "militancy" and "wildcat direct action" against hegemonic tech systems.
Historically, nineteenth-century workers threw their wooden shoes ( sabots ) into weaving machinery to stop production. The ASRG translates this concept into contemporary technical workflows. In public registers and technical toolkits, such as the curated records hosted on open platforms like Sarah Garcin Ressources , the group codifies an explicit list of offensive methodologies. Methodologies of Digital Resistance